Knowledge Prism Interactive Research Console

Learn the project by pressing its buttons.

This console teaches the epistemology of KNOWLEDGE_PRISM: archive is not evidence, retrieval is not evidence, sampled support is not ontology, and every escalation needs visible human judgment.

Loading public project counts...

Current project state

The live public snapshot, without overclaiming

-master corpus rows
-pilot works tested
-sample-supported candidates
0ontology-core rows

Zone 1

Project Compass

Zone 2

Evidence Ladder

Each step permits something different. A lower step may guide search, but it cannot impersonate a higher step.

Zone 3

Ontology Status Switch

Warning copy

Do not confuse the design map with the verified ontology.

The design map is useful because it gives the scholar a scaffold. It becomes dangerous only if the interface presents it as a text-verified concept ontology. The current verified ontology-core count is deliberately zero.

Zone 4

Retrieval and Queue: Anchor Candidate

category -> current example -> future candidates

Category

Anchor Candidate

A work that appears to organise a major research lens, concept-field, regional imagination, theoretical axis, cartographic frame, or methodological apparatus.

Current example

Dmitri Trenin, The End of Eurasia

Status: queued. Candidate type: anchor_candidate. Evidence status: retrieval clue only. Source: Recoll Kaleidoscope Trial 001.

Future candidates

Future anchor candidates remain open

Other possible anchor candidates may include classic geopolitical, regional-order, theoretical, cartographic, or methodological works such as Mackinder, Ratzel, Spykman, or other corpus-specific discoveries.

Zone 5

Boundary Kinematics

Current live example

Boundary proposal: Eurasian security imaginaries and post-Soviet spatial order may need explicit Layer A/AB recognition. Status: proposed_boundary_refinement. It is not adopted doctrine.

Zone 6

Two-Axis Judgment Matrix

Axis 2: project relevance
Low evidence support
Higher evidence support
Low project relevance

Misfile or noise

Practical Exam Format: administrative artifact. It does not become scholarship because a folder suggested relevance.

Accurate but irrelevant

Histology: textually accurate, but project-irrelevant. Supported content can still be excluded from the core.

High project relevance

Relevant clue, not evidence

Current example: Dmitri Trenin, The End of Eurasia. It is an anchor_candidate, queued only, not sampled.

Sample-supported candidates

The 11 pilot books are sampled-supported core candidates. They are still not concept-verified or ontology-core.

Design map sits outside the matrix as scaffold

The 43-node design map is project-useful but has status design_hypothesis, not verified evidence.

Zone 7

Action Buttons with Disabled States

non-mutating public interface

Buttons are pedagogic, not operational

Click a disabled action to see what approval or evidence would be required. No button on this page writes to project state.

Zone 8

Compact State Card

Ledger

- public blocks. Chain verification: -.

Queue

Anchor Candidate category exists. Current example remains queued and unsampled.

Evidence

- sampled-supported candidates; 0 concept-verified entries.

Ontology

Design map: 43 nodes / 136 edges, status design_hypothesis. Verified ontology-core: 0.